·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
>
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
|
Outside reviews of Kirsten's Room:
74.2/100
81/100 |
|
|
 Quick
Description: |
You can see her in Kirstens Room where she loves being a real teenager and you have the chance as a member to have real personal contact with her. This cute and innocent looking teen updates her website three times a week with photos and some home-made videos. Inside Kirstens Room members get access to her fan club along with her diary and photos from her every day life.
|
| Scores
(max. = 10): |
|
| Promised vs. Delivered: |
 
|
8/10 |
| Usability/Navigation: |
|
8/10 |
| Amount of Content: |
|
8/10 |
| Quality of Content: |
|
8/10 |
|
| |
TOTAL SCORE
/108 /10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Reviewed by Alex on Nov 12, 2005. |
| |
|
|
| |
| Members Area Review: |
Yes, the girls of Kirsten's room are legal. But they are young looking and cute as hell. This so-young-it's-nearly-wrong theme runs throughout the site, where these super cuties lounge and pose on frilly beds covered with stuffed animals, or pose in their Hello Kitty panties. And the whole site is pink and flowery.
There are two girls on most of the site. Both girls are adorable. Kirsten is blonde and full-figured, while Heather is a leaner brunette.
Let's get down to nuts and bolts. At the time of this review there were tons of pictures available for all members. Kirsten has more sets than Heather, but there is a good balance and a ton of categories like Swimwear, Fashion, Friends and Candids.
At the time of this review there definitely was a presence of softcore content rather than hardcore because in keeping with the sweet and innocent theme, these girls don't do hardcore. These photos are more about the girls showing off various outfits and looking lovable, than about the actual humping.
It's too bad, but, hey, as long as they're up front about it, there's no problem. The pose, roll around, look cute as hell, and then slowly strip down. Both Kirsten and Heather do some nice upskirt pussy shots, which is tasty to look at. The overall quality of the pictures is good.
Now, in videos, Heather only has three, but Kirsten has over a hundred. Like the pictures, the videos are softcore, but you can hear Kirsten talk, see her dance, watch her strip, all on video. The quality is good, and all of Kirsten's are downloadable in Mpeg format, while Heather's are MOV format.
Each girl performs for a live chat once a week, but if you miss a show, no sweat. The last ten are always archived in the archive section. The site also features Kirsten's diary, a fan club section with a message board and chat area, and a store where you can buy autographed products like DVDs and photos.
|
| Bottom Line: |
The price is slightly on the high end, sure, but if you are into cute young things being naughty, if softcore tease sites are your thing, then Kirsten's Room is where it's at, and it doesn't come much sweeter than this. With updates six times a week, you will have a hell of a time keeping up with all the content. There's always something new going on at this site! - click here to visit Kirsten's Room
|
| Prices: |
$29.95 for one month
$49.95 for two months
|
| |
| User
comments/reviews and ratings of Kirsten's Room: |
|
May 26, 2007 @ 01:31 by Wheezer - Rating: 1/5
If you like older Kirstens sets, then join for a month and download them. Treat it like an archive site.
However, do NOT expect a site where there are new pictures or regular updates.
In spite of what is listed on the join page, you will not be getting updated videos, picture sets or webcams.
As long as you know this going in, you will not be disappointed.
But as a regular $30 a month membership site, the value is really not there.
UPDATE:
On 25 May 2007 the site went away without any word to paying members. This has happened before so it might come up. In the past it would go off line for a week or so them come up, with never a word said to mambers (and many were auto-rebilled while he site was down). |
 |
May 30, 2007 @ 19:37 by W - Rating: 1/5
Was a member for a long time, then I just had to quit.
While it was a good site back in 2002, now it is just a shell.
Kirsten was always had a problem with timely updates, but the site now has reached a new low. The only "updates" are postings of sets 3-5 years old. When you look at her sample page, pull up any of the latest updated and look st the watermark, they typically say (c) 2003 or so.
For a brief while she did hardcore, but those are gone and she will not post them again .... look elsewhere if you want those older sets.
There is a forum section, but almost nothing goes on. Kirsten was last on the forum over three (3) weeks ago. She asked for set input, many member gave it, but nothing was ever heard from her. Her last message was asking members to donate money to her for outfits to model, or to send them to her.
Now her site consists of all very old content (3-5 years old), with mixed quality. Some are professional shots, while the bulk are cam caps.
Videos also range in quality, a few good ones but the bulk are web cam vids.
If chunky women are your fetish, then the site may be for you.
But just know going in to expect NO updates, and NO feedback from her.
It's really up to you if you think spending $30 a month for a site that does not update or care about it's paying members.
Take a look CAREFULLY before you join, don't be fooled by what you see on the join screen.
Cheers!
... W ... |
|
Jan 01, 2008 @ 02:18 by DAP - Rating: 1/5
When you have opnions like these others than the best thing to do is just stay away. There's way too much to choose from out there then to have to fuck around with stuff like this. |
Mar 15, 2008 @ 10:32 by Wheezer - Rating: 1/5
Well the site seems down for good.
K has the site up in December 2007 and only posted four (4) sets for the entire month. Not the 4 times a week as listed. One "new" set was just a video she has posted on youtube.
In mid January 2008 members started to ask on the fanclub if it was not just a scam to get some quick member cash to pay holiday bills.
A few days later, the fanclub went down to "test some functionality".
Since then, no updates, no fanclub, nothing.
If you decide to join, well, you have been warned. |
Apr 10, 2008 @ 23:34 by Jim - Rating: 3/5
I think Kirsten is sexy, sexy, sexy....I find the site was not what was portraid...she still is hot and sexy and looks well as a full figured sex kitten....mmmmmmgoood! |
Apr 28, 2008 @ 10:07 by SandyJeers - Rating: 3/5
I just don't find this girl very attractive. Sorry, but not for me. |
Jun 09, 2008 @ 14:15 by Samuel - Rating: 3/5
I have to agree with Sandy. I just don't find this girl that attractive. I'm sure I would probably fuck her in real life if I ever had the chance to, but for a web girl, my girls just have to be a lot hotter than this. |
Oct 05, 2008 @ 18:30 by GaryGrimes - Rating: 2/5
Wow, lots of opinions on this girl Kirsten, or more to the point lots of opinions on her website. While I do think she is okay looking for a baby fat covered teen, this site pretty much suck. It's like someboy put it up to make some money and they just don't pay any attention to it anymore. And that's a shame. |
|
|
|
|
